Wikileaks Reveals How Black Voters Got Played by Democrats

Wikileaks Reveals How Black Voters Got Played by Democrats
October 12 16:32 2016 Print This Article

Establishment Democrats are attempting to distract voters away from the Wikileaks revelations by ratcheting up rhetoric about an unfounded Russian threat.  Given that the press is on the side of the Clinton campaign, it may very well be working. Still, the revelations on how Clinton’s operatives used race to manipulate black voters should not be ignored.

Here’s a Democratic operative suggesting that Democrats use tokenism, i.e. identity politics, to win over black people:

wikileaks2

 

It was also revealed that Clinton’s camp, specifically Labor Secretary Tom Perez, intentionally cast Sanders as the candidate of white people to turn minorities against him:

“Nevada is an opportunity to fight back on so many levels,” Perez argued. “First, the current storyline is that she does not connect well with young voters. Given that Nevada is far more demographically representative of America, I am confident that HRC can do well with all African Americans, Latinos, and Asian Americans (don’t forget the sizeable [sic] population of Asian Americans in Nevada, including Filipinos.).”

Perez continued, “Emmy and the team have a good plan to attract all minority voters. When we do well there, then the narrative changes from Bernie kicks ass among young voters to Bernie does well only among young white liberals—that is a different story and a perfect lead in to South Carolina, where once again, we can work to attract young voters of color. So I think Nevada is a real opportunity, and I would strongly urge HRC to get out there within a couple days of [New Hampshire].”

This orchestrated plot included lawmakers like Rep. John Lewis, who said he’d “never seen” Bernie Sanders during the Civil Rights Movement, and Rep. Charlie Rangel, who said he “doesn’t know any black person who knows Bernie Sanders.”

view more articles

About Article Author

126 comments
amirimizan
amirimizan

What always gets me is why the presence of Trump made Hill look like a legitimate choice. We were and are so very bound up in binary thinking when voting. Both are bad choices. But notice how people who are economically secure play game: they play whoever runs. By economically secure, I really mean that they are more insular, insofar as the dollar turns many times in their community. Black dollars don't. Had we gotten that together, Trump or Hillary would not have mattered because they'd be in the pocket. They both have a constituency of influence, and we needed to form a bloc as one of those, not as ones who are told to just show up on Side A or Side B. Either we grow our own leadership and send them to Washington, or leverage the hell out of the ones sitting in there already.

Jay K. Nye
Jay K. Nye

Only retarded people "get played." A lot of the problems we have in the world could simply be avoided via common sense.

Kenneth Beasley
Kenneth Beasley

A so is trump supporters \U0001f602\U0001f602\U0001f602

44blue
44blue

Is Hillary hugging Hank Johnson, who was so embarassingly stupid he asked in a Congressional hearing whether Guam would "tip over and capsize" if more military was sent there? 

44blue
44blue

As well as warning Progressives not to waste your vote on "corporate Democrats who will betray you", Jill Stein says, "It should be clear to everyone that a vote for Hillary Clinton is a vote for war."

Does this trouble you?

 

"On the issue of war and nuclear weapons, it is actually Hillary's policies which are much scarier than Donald Trump who does not want to go to war with Russia. He wants to seek modes of working together, which is the route that we need to follow not to go into confrontation and nuclear war with Russia." - Jill Stein


John Podesta has 75,000 shares in a Putin-connected company ( which he failed to fully disclose, too!). Trump has zero ties to Russia. The Dems appear to be the most evil liars possible. There has not been one shred of evidence linking Russia to these Wikileaks, just the say-so of liars, whose chairman does have ties through his stocks.


Jill Stein will not win, and so she in good faith is warning us what will happen if Hillary is elected. She is not saying she supports Trump, but she is certainly warning us what may happen. Please don't vote for nuclear war.


Diamond and Silk may not be intellectuals but they are right when they say, "Get off the Democrat plantation!"

Johnw11
Johnw11

@44blue  Great comment. Except if enough people vote for Stein, she will win. Moreover, victory is not limited to number of votes received, or receiving a key to an office, victory is when enough people get the knowledge and courage to say "no more business as usual."

I'm glad you posted, because I've been trying to inform readers here since the day Clinton announced her candidacy, that she is a dangerous threat to world peace and her erratic mind-set will inevitably lead to nuclear war.

Ironically, she is running TV ads accusing Trump of being a nuclear war threat, when she is the one publicly calling for "no fly zones" against Russia, and falsely, or at most prematurely, accusing Russia of hacking DNC computers and interfering in "our" elections (it's been proven that she stole the nomination -- but it's "our" elections according to her) with no evidence, in order to distract from the crimes and other under-handed dirt the email leaks revealed.

Anyone can see she is setting up an excuse for war with Russia, by using the same category of lies Bush (who has endorsed her) used about WMDs. The only difference is, the world survived long enough to learn (those who didn't already know) that Bush was lying. Unfortunately, that will not be the case when she attacks Russia. It's the height of insanity! 


Clarence A Cavness
Clarence A Cavness

And what exactly will/has any Republican done for anyone except the rich?! Either way it's bad but seriously with these stupid articles!

MyreeWilliams
MyreeWilliams

you do realise, they're all rich and cater to who gives them funding? and you can look up their networth.

Republicans and Democrats/ Liberals both are very wealthy.

Leonard Walker
Leonard Walker

No deep analysis required. All we need to do is ask two specific questions. 1st what have WE specifically received for our votes? 2nd what are Democrats saying they will give us for our votes? Not them I'm advocating voting Republican. I'm just saying we have to get something for our votes. Voting for the lesser of two evils is a clear insult to our intelligence and when we accept that reasoning shows that we have no understanding about voting. How can you do worse than nothing? This why the lesser of two evils strategy is ridiculous. First we have nothing because we demand nothing. We listen to politicians and if they say the right things then we are sold.. Same results every election..

Antawan James
Antawan James

Wikileaks is a russian propaganda pushing think tank. Keep believing the garbage lies it pushes all you want. If it was truly leaking "truth" and unbiased why hasn't it dropped any "truth" about racist ass trump.

MyreeWilliams
MyreeWilliams

I actually just read somewhere that WikiLeaks work for our government-FBI and CIA , so I wonder who's telling the truth.

We don't really have to worry about Russian Propaganda, America has been using propaganda on it own people for over 40yrs plus.

Brenda Johnson
Brenda Johnson

Shut up. If you are in the poor or almost poor category, remember who benefits from many social programs. Like it or not it's true as far as I see it.

ROBERT JORDAN
ROBERT JORDAN

SO far what we've know from the leaks which its authenticity has not been denied by the parties involved, only that the RUSSIA'S are behind it, is HILLARY and the DNC have rigged the primaries against BERNIE, she has openly taken money and sold weapons to countries who are aiding ISIS and other terrorist groups and also she has a public and a private position on any given subject depending on her audience.


AS imperfect as TRUMP is, he looks angelic compared to this witch, and he's literally fighting  the whole political 

establishment[both party's] and the media all alone and he holding his own.


I for one have never even considered voting for a republican ever, but TRUMP will get my vote , he's a nationalist and a fighter and that's what this country needs , global government is not in our interest, black AMERICANS will not survive it.


https://youtu.be/ZFQcZMGe4p0



Larry Ethridge
Larry Ethridge

The Democrats have been playing us since the Kennedy era, PERIOD!

Janice Turner
Janice Turner

Still won't be a Republican Goal of this election KEEP trump OUT!!!

sweetsag
sweetsag

Hillary has spoken many issues that concern me, I am a fostermother, she was the only one to speak about fostercare, and many other things. I have never seen these original speeches to compare them to these Wikileaks documents, so I am not just going to believe some hacker from another country. There objective is to turn Americans against each other, we cannot be gullible and believe everything coming from another country that wants to do us harm. The thing about Trump is he made his own bed now he needs to deal with it, he has never been to an African American church until recently, neighborhoods, school, or inner city, the Central Park 5, the comments about blacks have a lazy trait, vote for him and we won't be shot, disrespect of women, he has offered no policy for me or my family. There are many other nationalities that are poor, not just black people. I will be voting my conscious, safety, future, VOTING FOR HILLARY!

carolaedw
carolaedw

@Johnw11 @sweetsag Your comment about the mentally challenged man's last request struck me to the heart. I'm sorry, they're both devils.

Johnw11
Johnw11

@carolaedw @sweetsag  I am glad you could "feel" how racist and indecent executing the Black man was. But keep in mind that he was not simply "mentally challenged" as in an intellectual disability, such as learning, etc., but he was totally mentally ill. That means that he had absolutely little to no connection to reality. The Dixicrats (Clintons) staged a well publicized temporary suspension of their 1992 presidential quest to go back to the Arkansas swamps and execute the man to show how tough they could be on Blacks for white votes.

Those are facts.

That stunt (to them) worked so well in getting "Bubba" elected that the Clintons once in office created a false "moral panic" about Blacks (jungle animals on drugs, having nonhuman babies, munching on welfare, parental irresponsibility, etc.) to get reelected with some of the most vile GOP racists known thus far in history in his cabinet and as chief advisors.

Those are facts.

Every policy, every implementation of ideas, every act of the Clintons' administration was anti Black in its very nature and every one of them has caused great harm to Blacks.

The Clintons managed to do this great harm to Blacks, while at the same time being supported by Blacks. They pulled it off by using the same method that they are using now, as revealed by the leaked emails. They used Black human mannequins, whose roles were to take photo ops, smile and giggle at his jokes, place their hands on his shoulders, ride on golf carts with him, etc.

Many Blacks, yearning to be accepted by whites, were ecstatic. He's "one of us," some declared in their depraved delusions.

Now they and their mannequins are back again. Same smiles, same lies, same plans to harm Blacks further. But Black America cannot take too many more blows. Times are hard. Blacks, having access to alternative sources of information, have begun to raise a fundamental question: "What's in it for our communities?" While the Clintons and their mannequins still have the minds of many -- which is not surprising, given TV's influence and the mannequin worshipping Black media --they do not have as many as they once had.

That worries them. Thousands of internet and talk radio trolls laid off after they stole the nomination have been recalled to work. Black deceivers posing as leaders have been given their orders :"Get  your a__ out there and get me my votes!"

"Yasum, boss," the misleadership mannequins say.

One can tell whenever they've been scolded, because that's when they increase pushing the Trump boogeyman line. He's going to eat your badies, put you back into slavery. Those Blacks still asleep, still admiring the mannequins, eat it up.  

But many Blacks, alert and intelligent,  are saying in various ways "Go to h---l. We already know Trump is bad news, but what about the Clintons?"

As you stated, since both are bad news, what is there to choose from between the two of them? 

Fortunately, we do have a choice, and I'm "with her" ---- Dr. Jill Stein and the Green Party ticket. Why? Because over 95% of their policy positions (available on their website) are consistent with my own values. I will not be intimidated by the irrational arguments made by Black misleaders as they, for personal gain, try and reach an assigned quota for turning out Black voters for Clinton to behave against their own interests. To vote to further destroy the Black community for certain, and highly likely the whole of life on planet earth.

Some Black Green voters are being harassed by Clinton Blacks with lies about they would vote for Stein themselves, but she "can't win." But how can she, if one doesn't vote for her? No candidate can win, unless voted for. That is the level of logic these people operate on, and the level is very low.

Johnw11
Johnw11

@sweetsag  Thank you for being a foster parent. I can understand why you feel Hillary spoke to your needs since her 1997 so-called "Adoption And Safe Families Act," did to poor Black children what her Omnibus crime bill did to their parents, enslaved them, thus increasing your monthly check. The horrible act was criticized by many Black socio-behavioral health professionals and organizations as slavery because it forced children (almost exclusively Black) to be taken from their parents and given to others (mostly whites) for trivia subjective reasons like homes being unclean, or having no food in the home (this after they'd placed the poor on starvation status with their 1996 "Welfare Reform Act," etc. Indeed, forcefully taking Black children from their families just like in chattel slavery, causing lifelong traumatic damage to the children.

I don't care about Trump in the least, but unlike you, I'm not stumbling around in a fog worrying about what Trump might do, while ignoring what the Clintons have already done and are thirsty to do again.. You mentioned Trump's ignorant bigotry regarding the Central Park Five, when he said they should get the death penalty although they were later proven innocent. What a horrible thing for him to say. But how do you juxtapose his 'words' with the Clintons' ACTUAL behavior of executing a mentally ill Black man who was so psychotic that he didn't understand that his last meal would be his last, so he asked that his desert be saved for later. How can you condone such immoral, racist, behavior? This the 'Dixicrats' did while co-governor of the Confederate state of Arkansas. And although data show that mostly Blacks are affected by it, she is still proud of that behavior and states she favors the death penalty right now, even though it has been declared immoral by the entire world, and many polls show most Americans oppose it. 

So, please stop playing the Trump boogeyman card. That doesn't work with me. I stopped being afraid of the "boogeyman" at age four. But I must admit I still have trouble with the "witched witch," because, unlike the boogeyman, who would only get you if you were bad, that witched witch could straddle her broom and fly everywhere sprinkling evil dust all over the planet as her shallow cast against the moon. She would get you whether you were good or bad.

In fact, she was so mobile on that broom, she might be in Haiti one moment stealing earthquake relief money, in the U.S. moments later hurling the most vile racist terms at Blacks -- "super predators" (jungle animals), and trying to start a nuclear war the next.

You say you are "voting for Hillary." Good for you, what else can you do? After all, she has helped you financially with adoptions and all. 

But I know that you don't know that what you are really saying is that you are "voting for nuclear war." And the final fact is, you may be "with her" in the voting booth, but you certainly will not be "with her" in that nuclear bomb shelter. You'll be atop the surface and incinerated "with us."

DapheneJohnson
DapheneJohnson

Why do so many people think that Black People don't vote on the issues and a party's platform, Well we do and there is nothing in the Republican Party platform especially this year to make me jump up and say I want to vote for them, and as far as Bernie is concerned, I don't know anyone in my personal Circle of family and friends or even my Church and Co workers,  that knew him before he ran for President ..I did because I follow Politics, I have always liked him and his message, but he was to soft when it came to issues concerning the Black Community...Voting for Hillary!! 

tcchat51
tcchat51

@DapheneJohnson We cannot believe the veracity of the in formation that Wiki is putting forth, the Russians are manipulating the data and we can no longer depend on wiki to bring forth accurate information anyone that believe this propaganda should re-evaluate their critical thinkingskills. (Lost all respect for wiki no longer credible)  

Johnw11
Johnw11

@Watchful Does everyone now understand what I've been saying for years about zealotry / fanaticism? A cardinal characteristic of zealotry/fanaticism is the tendency to irrationally "deny" reality when that reality conflicts with the need to worship a certain personality, belief, or idol-object.

This is not intended to berate anyone, but only to describe the affliction.  The condition is caused by a stupefying event -- or a pattern of prolonged exposure to another person or persons who is/ are afflicted -- that results in a separation of the higher and lower levels of consciousness. Thus a gap (if you will) is created in the information processing centers of the brain causing incoming information to pass through without being processed cognitively. Only emotional responses are generally experienced. (You may recall the old folks used to call it having "a hole in the head" when information would "go in one ear and out the other" after they'd grown frustrated at trying to explain simple things to a person who just didn't get it.)

That explains why-- although the evidence is irrefutable both in terms of the backstabbing scheming revealed by the emails, and the 50+ years history of Blacks getting nothing for their votes from the Dems-- some are still refusing to accept facts: refusing to "get it." Often times such persons have no idea that they are so afflicted.

44blue
44blue

@EmmVee The DNC and the Republicans are fighting Trump tooth and nail. A vote for Jill Stein is a vote for Hillary. Dr. Stein knows she can't win; therefore, she is concerned about Hillary and nuclear war. 

DelvinEdwards
DelvinEdwards

If you notice only our woman are defending Hillary because they are not thinking about our future or their children's future. It's sad....  

Johnw11
Johnw11

@DelvinEdwards I agree Delvin regarding some of those posting here, but Madeline Sandy Sanders is very intelligent. Most of the others are simply broke trolls for pay or foolish trolls for free. Anytime someone is dumb enough to say that Sanders was "weak" on Black issues, when he was the ONLY one discussing Black issues means that such a person is either a fool or a troll or both.

Although we must respect everyone's opinion, we don't have to agree with such uninformed opinions. I'm not a gambling man, but I bet DapheneJohnson (or any of the others -- note that ODDOWL is yet to answer my questions) couldn't articulate one Dem platform item that relates to "Black issues," because there aren't any. The Clinton reps on the Dem platform committee wouldn't even let Sanders' reps institute an anti TPP plank: a trade deal that will completely destroy what's left of African American communities after the Clintons' NAFTA.

Moreover, anyone conversant with mechanics of politics know that party platforms are never adhered to after elections in the first place. That's how I immediately knew that Daphene doesn't know what she's talking about.

It's not that she doesn't care about her children, I believe she does, she's just uninformed and doesn't understand the relationship between "policy" and "personality," nor, it appears, does she understand the relationship between past behavior and future behavior.

Frankly at this point, the biggest fear for everyone in the world should be staying alive, because if Clinton wins it has been agreed by almost every known expert that she will start a nuclear war with Russia. She is obsessed with it, and in fact declared war on Russia in the last debate. She claims that Russia "hacked' the Dems and blames it for the release of all the DIRT they've been caught engaging in. Of course it's only a diversion from the consequences of the dirt, because they have not submitted one iota of proof, yet she behaves as if she has proof. Even Trump keeps telling her to show proof of her claims, or stop advocating for nuclear war with Russia which will end all life on this planet. THIS IS VERY SERIOUS; some people are trying to elect an insane person to the presidency who loves war, hates Blacks, and can't stand up for ten minutes without fainting unless she's drugged up.  There's plenty of information about this in both the literature and on youtube. (Hillary Clinton's mental / physical health issues.)  If you haven't done so already, please review the facts and see how she slips without warning into loud, long, off-topic, inappropriate laughter, head bobbing, and coughing spells. She becomes irate instantaneously with no precipitant socio-environmental stimuli except hearing several voices at the same time. That's why the media, in their effort to swindle the public with this damaged candidate, don't allow applause at the debates -- excessive noise will activate her condition and she'd start laughing, head bobbing, and cursing out people right on the debate stage. If her handlers should ever under- medicate her before debates the whole world will see it. Imagine, given her psychological instability, if she should catch her husband with one of those intern teens AGAIN: with her having access to nuclear weapons. IMAGINE THAT!!!

None of us, if we are responsible, would allow a friend or family member who's just caught, or learned of his / her mate's cheating, access to a dangerous weapon of any kind. To do so would be the height of irresponsibility both socio- morally and legally. So why in the world would we want to let her have access to nuclear weapons? That doesn't make sense to even a rat.

Finally, her duped (or paid) supporters  like to trash talk about the GOP (which I agree is no good), but how is voting for Clinton voting against the GOP when almost all GOP elites are "with her"? To believe that a vote for Clinton is a vote against the GOP is paradoxical to the point of insanity -- since they are "with her." Even a five year old child would be able to think abstractly enough to know that a vote for Clinton is a vote for Bush, the Koch Brothers, Cheney, ALEC, Kissinger, and the other vile "I'm with her"  top GOP heads. There are no defined GOP-Dem lines anymore. There haven't been since the 1980s when the Clintons changed the old FDR, LBJ, progressive Dem party into a replica of the right-wing GOP called "New" or "Third Way" Dems. Now she and the GOP have come out the closet and made it official. They ware "with her."  But I refuse to vote for Bush and Cheney, which is what a vote for her would be--since they are "with her" and her them. They are one and the same! Poor Daphene, she has been so out-of -touch (trying to get money for her mannequin dress) that she didn't notice. But she is probably a good person (Daphene not Hillary).

It's sad to know that some adults can't think on the level of a child. This, despite the fact that children depend on them for guidance.

I personally and professionally know of cases where teenage children had to take charge and tell their parents: "Mom, Dad, here's how this is going to work-- you are going to the polls next week and you are going to vote for 'Bernie' so I can have future. I will not be Hillary's super predator. You all did not give birth to jungle animals."

Now that Sanders is no longer running, WE MUST VOTE GREEN! Unless we want to be incinerated in a nuclear apocalypse.

EmmVee
EmmVee

Wikileaks isn't trying to play us. They're trying to educate and inform us, because the MSM isn't. Wikileaks has won numerous awards for their work. They have a 100% accuracy rating. Hopefully, you voted for an honest candidate who isn't a puppet of the oligarchs. Good luck to you.

DelvinEdwards
DelvinEdwards

@plcarter61  Genius these are real emails. Whether they came from your cousin or your cousin they are emails written by people. What's wrong with your brain, they are trying to help you wake to truth. Emails only say what someone types in them and if you are not smart enough to know this, your vote should be taken away. 

Johnw11
Johnw11

@plcarter61 @DelvinEdwards  John Podesta, Clinton's campaign manager, nor anyone else has denied that the emails are theirs. The only response they've emitted is to attempt to divert from the incriminating evidence the emails revealed by threatening nuclear war with Russia. So why are you denying the authenticity of the emails for them?

Why you do support nuclear war? If you have a problem with living, then seek help. If you chose not to seek help, then that's on you. But please, leave the rest of the world out of it.

ODDOWL
ODDOWL

Black voters make up the base of the Democrat party...  Why would the writer of this article wish to diminish our chances of winning the presidency by attempting to weaken Black voters enthusiasm  ??? Perhaps Breaking Brown are Bernie Sanders supporters or worst stealth Republicans who support Herr Donald "Birtherism" Trump...

JoeHanussak
JoeHanussak

@ODDOWL Herr Hillary "Bitherism" Clinton.  Her people started that crap, Trump finished it.

Johnw11
Johnw11

@ODDOWL  Would you please answer two questions for me?

1. What do you mean by "our" presidency, since the Dems have been caught red-handed plotting and scheming to not do anything for Blacks this time around except  what they've done for the past 50 years; use Black personality mannequins to lure Black votes? Unless you are one of the mannequins, what do YOU plan get out of it? Please explain.

2. Since you are falsely accusing informed and thinking people of being "Republican" conspirators against 'your' Democrats, how do you explain that nearly all of the top Republican donors and leaders, including the Koch Brothers, Bushes, Cheney, ALEC et al. have said they are "with her"?  Please explain.

Watchful
Watchful

@charactorman 


I appreciate u sharing this. That said, it doesn't necessarily mean that Hillary isn't racist, just that this particular email can't be credited to her.

Johnw11
Johnw11


@Watchful @charactorman Actually, the emails are about the Dem Party which is the same as her campaign, which is the same as her. The leaked email that I have been responding to is the one contained in the above article on THIS site (so there will be no confusion).


Watchful
Watchful

@Johnw11 


Yeah, John ... but I was just responding to charactorman's reply to Robert's post which was addressing THAT specific email. U already know how I feel about BOTH major political parties, in terms of the being racist. 

Johnw11
Johnw11

@Watchful I know you know. Just wanted to make it clear so there would be no confusion with others which was the intent of the troll you responded to in the first place.

It was good hearing from you.

sweetsag
sweetsag

Thank you! No one has read her original speeches so how could they say these speeches are hers. If Wikileaks can hack all of the Dems info, I'm just curious how come they cannot get Trumps taxes! Wink wink!

Johnw11
Johnw11

@sweetsag  All she has to do is release her speeches, then we will know, won't we? Wink, Wink.

Trackbacks

  1. […] for access to Clinton. Some emails also referred to Latinos as “taco bowl voters.” Others displayed naked cynicism toward African American voters. Anyone listening only to the BBC’s coverage would have no idea any of this had […]